Solutions — Fraud Program

Know Where Your Fraud Program Falls Short—Before Your Auditors Do.

For Chief Compliance Officers and CFOs responsible for the fraud risk program at organizations of any size.

See How It Works ↓

Self-paced

No scheduling or coordination required. Work through the program on your own schedule.

Secure by design

No names. No free-text. Nothing sensitive.

Board-ready findings

Auditable analysis mapped to frameworks your board recognizes.

The Situation

Fraud program reviews are rarely voluntary. Here's what typically drives the need.

🔍

Fraud Program Maturity Review

Regulators, auditors, or the audit committee have asked about the maturity of your fraud risk program. You need a documented assessment that goes beyond a checklist.

⚠️

Post-Incident Review

A fraud event—internal or external—has occurred or was narrowly avoided. Leadership wants to understand what controls failed and where the gaps are. You need findings, not just recommendations.

📅

Annual Program Assessment

Your fraud risk program requires annual documentation under ACFE standards or internal policy — and for public companies, SOX-related internal controls requirements. Prior assessments are outdated or inadequate for this year's audit cycle.

What Compliance Leaders Actually Need

Documentation that holds up to audit committee scrutiny and regulatory examination.

  • Fraud risk exposure across asset misappropriation, financial statement fraud, and corruption
  • Industry-specific fraud scheme identification and prioritization
  • Control effectiveness ratings and gap analysis
  • Findings mapped to ACFE Fraud Risk Management Guide
  • COSO ERM compliance documentation
  • Scheme-level findings with likelihood and impact ratings
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap with effort/impact scoring
  • Assessment Comparison Report documenting control improvements between runs
  • Report suitable for audit committee and regulator review

How VeloRisk Addresses It

Scheme-level analysis with the framework alignment your auditors and examiners expect.

Fraud Scenario Analysis

VeloRisk identifies the fraud schemes most relevant to your industry and operational profile—asset misappropriation, financial statement fraud, corruption, and others—and assesses your control environment against each.

ACFE and COSO Aligned

Findings are mapped to ACFE Fraud Risk Management Guide and COSO ERM (2017), plus FATF 40, FFIEC, FTC Red Flags, and other applicable frameworks. Documentation your auditors and examiners will recognize.

Control Gap Analysis

Every finding includes a control gap assessment with effort/impact scoring on recommended remediation. Your compliance team gets prioritized, actionable guidance—not just a list of observations.

Re-Run After Controls Are Implemented

After addressing gaps, re-run the assessment to document the improvement. The Assessment Comparison Report shows exactly what changed between runs—before/after evidence your audit committee, examiner, or insurer can point to. Unlimited reassessments are included with the Annual Program subscription.

The Right Program for Your Situation

Designed specifically for fraud program evaluation—not a repurposed enterprise risk checklist.

Fraud Program

Fraud scenario analysis with control gap findings, maturity scoring, and remediation roadmap—mapped to ACFE, COSO, and the frameworks your regulators reference.

ACFE COSO ERM FATF 40 FFIEC Auth FFIEC BSA/AML FTC Red Flags GDPR ISO 27001 NIST CSF 2 NIST SP 800-53 PCI DSS SOC 2
Learn More →

Understand Your Fraud Exposure Before It Becomes a Finding

Scheme-level analysis. ACFE and COSO aligned. Ready before your auditors ask.

See the Fraud Program →